Skip to main content

★★★☆☆ This is how it has to be

Steven Weinberg: A Life in Physics

Steven Weinberg

In reviewing The Impossible ManPatchen Barss's biography of Roger Penrose, I remarked, "If I were asked to name the greatest physicists of the second half of the twentieth century, I would probably choose three: Richard FeynmanSteven Weinberg, and Roger Penrose." It is broadly agreed that the greatest physicist of the twentieth century was Albert EinsteinEinstein's great work was relativity, the Special and General Theories. Ironically, it is the General Theory of Relativity that is special. The Special Theory was in the air -- had Einstein not existed, the Special Theory would have been worked out by other physicists at about the same time in much the same form. But General Relativity is Einstein's. It would eventually have been found in some form without him -- indeed, Weinberg might well have discovered it as the force mediated by a massless spin 2 gauge boson -- but General Relativity when and as humans first discovered it was a product of Einstein's mind.

Other great physicists did something similarly personal. Isaac Newton invented the calculus, but so did Gottfried Leibniz. Indeed, Leibniz arguably did it better. But it was Newton who realized that the moon falls toward the Earth in the same way as an apple does, and indeed that the Earth falls towards the sun in that same way. Newton's special sauce was universality -- the rules are the same for everyone everywhere. Feynman, too, made his work personal. The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics and Feynman diagrams are his and no one else's. Penrose's specialty was his extraordinary geometric vision.

I read Steven Weinberg: A Life in Physics in search of Weinberg's special sauce. I think I found it: what Weinberg was looking for was inevitability. He wanted to show that the laws of the universe are what they are because nothing else is possible. He didn't succeed. He was the great architect of The Standard Model -- our current best understanding of the forces of nature other than gravity. Modern physicists disdain the Standard Model, precisely because of its lack of necessity. It bristles with unnecessary and arbitrary details. But even in those complaints they are reflecting Weinbergian principles of what physics ought to be.

Weinberg was writing his memoirs when he died. He had finished his notes for the twentieth century 2-Jun-2021. A Life in Physics is those notes, minimally edited by his wife Louise, as the publisher explains in a Publisher's Note:

At the time of his death on July 23, 2021, Steven Weinberg’s memoirs were incomplete, covering his life and work up to the end of the twentieth century. The raw notes were collated by his widow, Louise Weinberg, Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin. Following his instructions, Louise first edited them to remove any material that he would have wanted to edit out himself.

Weinberg was capable of writing clearly and engagingly for a general audience, as shown by The First Three Minutes and Dreams of a Final Theory. This is not that. A Life in Physics is full of material that will be incomprehensible if you have not studied quantum field theory. There are also long tedious descriptions of Steven and Louise's social engagements. Weinberg describes himself and his wife as "clubbable," and they certainly knew a lot of famous people, both inside and outside physics. A Life in Physics is not the polished memoir that Weinberg would certainly have published had he lived long enough. It's a rough read, really only for those who are interested enough in Weinberg to work through it.

Louise Goldwasser Weinberg is a huge presence in Weinberg's story. They met as Cornell undergraduates and married soon after. He writes "once married to my girl I wanted to be with her all the time." She became a distinguished legal scholar, and the Weinbergs followed each other all over the world. In fact, he left a prestigious position at Harvard to be with her at the University of Texas at Austin, where he remained from 1983 until his death. He won a Nobel prize in 1979. Unlike many Nobel Laureates, he continued to be relevant and productive for decades. Louise deserves much of the credit for keeping him sane and grounded. Indeed, Steven and Louise would make a great love story, except for the absence of any conflict to liven it up.

In summary, A Life in Physics is a rough but interesting specialist work.

Steven Weinberg: A Life in Physics on Amazon

Goodreads review


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

★★★★☆ Alana in show-biz

Saga, Volume 4 Brian K. Vaughan, Fiona Staples (Illustrator) If you're like me, your first question on seeing  Saga, Volume 4  is, "Who is that woman on the cover?" That, my dear friend, is Alana. About halfway through  Volume 3  Alana and Marko had a brief conversation about The Circuit, which is a performance venue of some kind that people can tune into with a virtual reality helmet. Before she became a soldier, Alana harbored ambitions of performing on the Circuit. Now that their lethal pursuit has been temporarily distracted or put out of commission, they're focused on making some kind of living. Marko encouraged her to audition. So now Alana is performing on the Circuit, and what you see on the cover is her bewigged with wings bound and hidden in order to perform. She's the family breadwinner. Marko is a househusband, staying home and taking care of Hazel. The Marko-Alana-Hazel story in this volume is a bit dull. Without giving away any spoilers, it's kin...

★★★☆☆ The Great Geometer

The Impossible Man: Roger Penrose and the Cost of Genius Patchen Barss If I were asked to name the greatest physicists of the second half of the twentieth century, I would probably choose three:  Richard Feynman ,  Steven Weinberg , and  Roger Penrose . (I am a neuroscientist and a mathematician with a long interest in physics. I'm not the best person to choose great physicists, but I'm not the worst.) Thus when my local Theoretical Physics Institute (every town should have one!), the  Perimeter Institute , announced a public presentation by  Patchen Barss , a science journalist who has written this biography of  Penrose , I immediately snagged a ticket. Barss  wounded my confidence by emitting that cliché of the science popularizer: that you make science interesting by telling the "human story." Oh, please! I don't read a biography of  Penrose  for the sake of the human story. Why do science popularizers find it so hard to believe that there...

★★★☆☆ Advice I am not going to follow

The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals Michael Pollan Michael Pollan  is a person who cares deeply about food. I am not (which is a little strange, since I worked 31 years as a neuroscientist studying feeding behavior). “Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat.” ― Socrates I am definitely a person who eats to live. There are a few books in what I call the "history of substances" genre, for instance  The True History of Chocolate ,  A Perfect Red , or  A History of the World in 6 Glasses . I find these fascinating and would be happy to find more. I picked up  The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World  and  The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals  because I thought they were books in this vein, and  The Omnivore's Dilemma  was getting a lot of love from my friends. Well, my hopes were not completely disappointed.  The Omnivore's Dilemma  does indeed contain fascinating information a...

★★★☆☆ Lacking the common touch

100 Selected Poems: John Keats John Keats Well, that was disappointing. I am ready to admit that this is an "It's not you -- it's me," case. Since I suspect that some other readers, even readers who love poetry, may likewise find  Keats  disappointing, I will try to explain why he disappointed me. Thus you can judge whether you, too, might suffer the same fate. First thing to say is that the young  John Keats  was not really that great a poet. (By "young", I mean up to and including  Endymion .) That, of course, is a judgment many readers will disagree with, but don't discount it! It was  Keats 's own judgment. In his preface to  Endymion , he says "I apologize for the lousy work, but I just had to get this out of my system." (Obviously I'm paraphrasing.) You may dismiss that as false modesty, but I am more inclined to accept it as the judgment of a man who knew what he was talking about, especially because the quality of his poetry abr...

★★★★☆ Courage and principle, betrayed by history

Longstreet: The Confederate General Who Defied the South Elizabeth R Varon My first knowledge of Confederate general James Longstreet came as a result of reading  Michael Shaara 's splendid historical novel  The Killer Angels , which  Elizabeth Varon , in  Longstreet: The Confederate General Who Defied the South  describes thus A finely grained fictional account of the Gettysburg campaign, the book conjured the strained relationship of Longstreet and Lee, casting Longstreet as a prescient pragmatist oriented toward the future, who symbolized modern warfare, and Lee as the prideful romantic, backward-looking and resigned to fate. Why had I never heard of Longstreet? Because the USA doesn't want to remember him. At the end of the Civil War, Longstreet, unlike the huge majority of Confederate officers, accepted defeat. Longstreet was a great friend of Union general Ulysses S Grant, and he was inspired by Grant's generosity in victory to behave in such a way as to d...

★☆☆☆☆ Petty Evil 101: Corporate edition

Power Jeffrey Pfeffer I read this eleven years ago (21-Sep-2011). At the time, I wrote this brief note to myself: Based on the first chapter or two, a singularly repulsive little book. It's basically "Petty Evil 101: Corporate edition". Amazon review Goodreads review  

★★★☆☆ Introducing Rincewind and Twoflower and The Luggage

The Color of Magic Terry Pratchett I have an ambiguous relationship with  Terry Pratchett  and the  Discworld . On the one hand, I have enjoyed everything I've ever read by  Pratchett , some more than others. On the other hand,  Pratchett  is so relentlessly and extravagantly hyped by his supporters that it always put my back up. ( Pratchett  himself is innocent of the hype, claiming that "his greatest service to literature was to avoid writing any.") The  Discworld  is equally daunting in a different way. It consists (according to Amazon) of 41 books. I didn't want to commit to a 41-book series.  Pratchett , no fool, understands the reluctance of readers to embark on such a journey, and claims that "The Discworld novels can be read in any order." I will not say that he's lying, because it is certainly physically POSSIBLE to read the series in any order, but he is definitely indulging in some heavy-grade misdirection. I know because I tr...

★★★★☆ Making heroes of Rednecks and Hillbillies

Demon Copperhead Barbara Kingsolver You already know that  Demon Copperhead  by  Barbara Kingsolver  is a retelling of  David Copperfield  by  Charles Dickens . Indeed, it is so faithful a retelling that, if the publisher had not already spilled the beans, I would feel compelled to mark this review a spoiler because of mentioning  David Copperfield . If you have read  David Copperfield  at all recently, then you will recognize the characters and the major plot points as you read  Demon Copperhead . (I last read  David Copperfield  when I was a kid in the late 1960s, so I was blessedly free from this detailed anticipation as I read  Demon Copperhead . I did, however, check out the Wikipedia plot summary of  David Copperfield  on finishing  Demon Copperhead , so I'm up to speed on both plot outlines.) And this, I say, is absolutely fine! If you're going to steal, by all means, steal from the best! I am co...

★★★☆☆ Drivel with occasional brilliance

Songs of Innocence and Experience William Blake I have to begin with a disclaimer. Usually I read poetry very slowly, one or two poems a day. This gives me the time to savor it. However, I had surgery two days ago and brought  William Blake 's  Songs of Innocence and Experience  along to read while waiting for the surgeons to slice me open. It is possible that these are not the best conditions for appreciating  Blake . With that caveat, I was more disappointed than pleased by this volume of poetry. It consists mostly of drivel like this: When the green woods laugh with the voice of joy, And the dimpling stream runs laughing by; When the air does laugh with our merry wit, And the green hill laughs with the noise of it; interrupted by occasional flashes of brilliance like this O rose, thou art sick! The invisible worm, That flies in the night, In the howling storm, Has found out thy bed Of crimson joy, And his dark secret love Does thy life destroy. or this The human d...

★★★★☆ Enola is looking for a friend

The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan Nancy Springer I just finished three weighty novels. If you care, and there is no reason I know that you should, they were  City of Miracles ,  The Running Grave , and  Starling House , good novels all, but no light fare. Therefore, I told myself wisely, "Self! What you want now is something light and sweet and crunchy! You want an  Enola Holmes  novel!" Thus I gobbled down Book 4,  The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan . It was just the thing!  Pink Fan  is the best  Enola Holmes  book so far, in my opinion. Enola is not OK. Despite her mother's frequently repeated mantra, "You will do very well on your own", Enola is not doing great on her own. Abandoned at the age of fourteen by her mother, hunted by her formidable brothers Sherlock and Mycroft, who want to take her freedom away, and without friends, Enola longs for affection. To be sure, plenty remains of the funds her mother embezzled from Mycroft and l...