Skip to main content

★★★☆☆ The Great Geometer

The Impossible Man: Roger Penrose and the Cost of Genius

Patchen Barss

If I were asked to name the greatest physicists of the second half of the twentieth century, I would probably choose three: Richard FeynmanSteven Weinberg, and Roger Penrose. (I am a neuroscientist and a mathematician with a long interest in physics. I'm not the best person to choose great physicists, but I'm not the worst.) Thus when my local Theoretical Physics Institute (every town should have one!), the Perimeter Institute, announced a public presentation by Patchen Barss, a science journalist who has written this biography of Penrose, I immediately snagged a ticket.

Barss wounded my confidence by emitting that cliché of the science popularizer: that you make science interesting by telling the "human story." Oh, please! I don't read a biography of Penrose for the sake of the human story. Why do science popularizers find it so hard to believe that there exist humans who are really genuinely interested in science? I will grant that such people are a minority of the population at large, but are they a minority of those who are likely to read a biography of Roger Penrose? Not obvious, in my opinion.

It's not that I'm uninterested in human stories, but novelists have that literary ground covered. If you're about to complain that novels are fiction, allow me to point out that theoretical physics is no more real. Most theoretical physics is done by working with simplified fictional models of reality. So, Penrose has a human story, it's told in rather too much detail here, and it is honestly just not all that interesting. Penrose was self-centered and selfish in a way that many men are.

If you didn't understand Penrose's work as a physicist, you would have a hard time learning it here. I, however, have long been interested in Penrose and have read several of his books, so I was able to fill in from my own knowledge.

Penrose is a brilliant geometer. Barss tells a story about this. One night Penrose gathered with a bunch of students at one of the student's homes for a movie night -- this was a regular thing. That night they had decided to share ice cream. Someone brought boxes of ice cream. They found that the student didn't have freezer space for all the ice cream. It was clearly impossible to get all that ice cream into that tiny freezer. Then this happened:

The crowd looked on as [Penrose] shifted items around the freezer and fridge. It dawned on David exactly what they were witnessing. “Over about fifteen seconds, we went from one state of mind to another. First, we were sure that he couldn’t possibly fit it all in there because we couldn’t. Then it looked as though he was making headway. And then we had a funny moment when we looked at each other and realized we had just asked the world’s leading expert on packing things to pack the ice cream into my freezer. And sure enough, he managed it. It was an impossible task, but he managed it.”

So, the Impossible Man.

Now, Einstein's theory of general relativity is all about geometry. Thus Penrose was able to figure out such puzzles as how to pack tiles together to cover a plane with pentagons, but also to prove that black holes must form when a big star collapses. It was a three-page paper published in 1964, and in 2020 it won him a Nobel Prize. (Interestingly Penrose proved this just after Belinsky, Khalatnikov, and Lifshitz proved that it was almost impossible for a black hole to form. Lifshitz found the error in his proof and published it soon after.)

Towards the end of his life Penrose fell into a trap that catches many of the most prominent scientists. He was so charismatic and so respected that there was no longer anyone who could tell him when he had gone off the rails. He became certain that he KNEW the answers to some questions, and that is death for a scientist. The first such step was his book The Emperor's New Mind, in which he proposed that consciousness is an effect of quantum mechanics.

The Emperor's New Mind was the first book of Penrose's that I read. I was by nature strongly resistant to his view that machine consciousness is impossible -- it smacks of vitalism, which I abhor. But I was impressed by the first half of the book. Penrose convinced me of things that I didn't think I could be convinced of. And then he began to discuss neuroscience, and the book fell off a cliff. I am a neuroscientist, so I am qualified to have opinions on the subject, and it was obvious that Penrose really fundamentally didn't understand certain things about how brains work. It's a great book. It's wrong, but it's brilliantly wrong. Daniel Dennett, who reviewed it, called it

the ultimate academic shaggy dog story, a tale whose fascinating digressions outweigh the punch line by a large factor.

and also said,

Penrose is wrong in a pretty interesting and clear way. I mean this not in a backhanded way at all. If you can make a really clear and tantalizing mistake, that’s very useful. Many of the advances of science have come from the correcting of other people’s mistakes

Penrose also may have gone off the rails as a physicist. His Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe is another brilliant and, I suspect, brilliantly wrong, book.

The Impossible Man is, in my opinion, an adequate but not superb biography of Roger Penrose. It is also, by virtue of being the only one, the best biography of Penrose. I wish I had not had to slog through the many, many pages about Penrose's personal relationships, but I am not sorry I read it. But if you want to understand Roger Penrose, you should read his books in addition to this biography.

The Impossible Man on Amazon

Goodreads review


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

★★★★☆ What are these people?

Red Side Story Jasper Fforde When I reviewed   Shades of Grey , the first novel in  Jasper Fforde 's  Shades of Grey  series, I asked Although I referred to Eddie as a young man, it is not clear to me what the people of the Collective are. I think they are more-or-less human. ... However, in some ways they behave like automata. These are puzzles that I hope Jasper Fforde will clear up in subsequent novels in the Shades of Grey series. Now I'm patting myself on the back, because that is indeed what  Red Side Story  is about. Or so say I. You might think it is about other things -- a love story, a fight to survive, a battle for justice, a cycle race -- and you would not be wrong.  Red Side Story  contains multitudes. Shades of Grey  ended in a flurry of revelations about the Collective. Eddie, Jane and Courtland Gamboge visited the abandoned town of High Saffron, where Jane revealed that all the people supposedly sent to Reboot were in fact sen...

★★★★☆ The Duchess, the Prince, and the Preacher

The Apocalypse Codex Charles Stross Bob Howard, we have been told several times in the previous three  Laundry Files  novels, is being groomed for rapid advancement in the Laundry. In this episode he is given a "training wheels" assignment by Gerald Lockhart, a senior manager in the Department of External Assets, a division of the Laundry of which Bob understands little, and most of that wrong. He is asked to supervise two of the external assets Gerry's division manages: the sorceress Persephone Hazard (codename BASHFUL INCIENDARY) and her muscle Johnny McTavish (codename JOHNNY PRINCE) as they investigate Raymond Schiller, the pastor of an American megachurch called the Golden Promise Ministries, which has begun fishing for converts in the Prime Minister's cabinet, making him a person of interest to UK intelligence agencies. Bob is to tag along and supervise (in the lightest possible way, since they know what they're doing and he does not) the operation. Well, as...

★★★★☆ Enola is looking for a friend

The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan Nancy Springer I just finished three weighty novels. If you care, and there is no reason I know that you should, they were  City of Miracles ,  The Running Grave , and  Starling House , good novels all, but no light fare. Therefore, I told myself wisely, "Self! What you want now is something light and sweet and crunchy! You want an  Enola Holmes  novel!" Thus I gobbled down Book 4,  The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan . It was just the thing!  Pink Fan  is the best  Enola Holmes  book so far, in my opinion. Enola is not OK. Despite her mother's frequently repeated mantra, "You will do very well on your own", Enola is not doing great on her own. Abandoned at the age of fourteen by her mother, hunted by her formidable brothers Sherlock and Mycroft, who want to take her freedom away, and without friends, Enola longs for affection. To be sure, plenty remains of the funds her mother embezzled from Mycroft and l...

★★★★★ A Cyberspace Cowboy

Count Zero William Gibson Count Zero  was the first book in  William Gibson 's  Cyberspace  trilogy I read. I picked it up in an airport bookstore, where it was on display, so it was probably pretty newly published -- let's say 1984. The Internet existed -- I had been using it to send email, although that was still pretty difficult and took some figgerin. It would be another ten years before  Tim Berners-Lee 's World-Wide Web got off the ground as a thing that any academic could use, and thus a version of  Gibson 's cyberspace became real. There were no eBooks back them (not really), which meant that a person like me, who must ALWAYS have a book to read, had to carry a backpack full of heavy paper books when I traveled. A quick glance in the bookstore made it clear that  Count Zero  was my kind of book. And it was. As it happens, the series works almost equally well in the order  Count Zero ,  Neuromancer ,  Mona Lisa Overdrive ...

★★★☆☆ Commentary disguised as a novel

The Handmaid's Tale Margaret Atwood I think I read  The Handmaid’s Tale  around 1986, when it first came out and became famous. I found it tedious. I have since looked at one or two other works by  Margaret Atwood , and honestly, I have never enjoyed one. You have probably spotted my problem. It is that verb "enjoy". I read books for enjoyment. Not only enjoyment, but also enlightenment and information, and to broaden my mind. But I also enjoy those things, so the verb "enjoy" should not be taken to imply that I will only read a book that is a ball of fun fluff. (Indeed, if you care to peruse the list of books I have recently reviewed, you'll see a five-star review for  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering . Let me just state, for the record, that  The Handmaid’s Tale  is less entertaining than  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos . To me! Of course I speak only for myself.) But  The Handmaid’s T...

★★★★★ Tactical Assault Clown

Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass—How I Went 77 Years Without Growing Up Dave Barry There is one living human who can write prose that makes me laugh so hard I can't breathe. That person is Tactical Assault Clown  Dave Barry .  Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass—How I Went 77 Years Without Growing Up  had that effect on me at least twice -- an automatic five-star rating. ("Tactical Assault Clown" is right up there with "Combat Epistemologist" ( The Jennifer Morgue ) on my list of creative military specializations. And if you're one of those people who get their knickers all in a twist when someone uses parens inside of parens, you know what you can do about it.) (Yes, I know I'm not funny.) It's not all ROFL funny. In fact, he tells about his father's alcoholism ( that story has a happy ending ) and his mother's suicide ( that one obviously does not ). Later in the book he tries to convince us that his real li...

★★★★☆ Ultimately, I found I didn't believe it

The Wire David Simon Yesterday I watched the last episode of Season 5 of  The Wire . Well, it was good. Obviously, it was good. It has won all kinds of awards, and everyone on Earth will tell you how great it is.  What I mean specifically is that it's good entertainment . The plots are intricate and engaging, and the characters are charismatic and well drawn. But I find myself reluctant to confer on it the mantle of greatness that almost everyone else does. Here's how I felt after watching the last episode. Many threads were brought to satisfying ends. We end up with a lot of vivid characters: the corrupt politician, the pushers, the international drug traffickers, the dope fiend, and murder police, murder police, murder police. And you know what? I didn't believe in any of them. They were all obviously fictional constructs. Well, I hear you saying, what did you expect? They are fiction. You knew that going in. But the best fiction transcends itself. You don't strain t...

★★★★☆ Making heroes of Rednecks and Hillbillies

Demon Copperhead Barbara Kingsolver You already know that  Demon Copperhead  by  Barbara Kingsolver  is a retelling of  David Copperfield  by  Charles Dickens . Indeed, it is so faithful a retelling that, if the publisher had not already spilled the beans, I would feel compelled to mark this review a spoiler because of mentioning  David Copperfield . If you have read  David Copperfield  at all recently, then you will recognize the characters and the major plot points as you read  Demon Copperhead . (I last read  David Copperfield  when I was a kid in the late 1960s, so I was blessedly free from this detailed anticipation as I read  Demon Copperhead . I did, however, check out the Wikipedia plot summary of  David Copperfield  on finishing  Demon Copperhead , so I'm up to speed on both plot outlines.) And this, I say, is absolutely fine! If you're going to steal, by all means, steal from the best! I am co...

★★★☆☆ Lacking the common touch

100 Selected Poems: John Keats John Keats Well, that was disappointing. I am ready to admit that this is an "It's not you -- it's me," case. Since I suspect that some other readers, even readers who love poetry, may likewise find  Keats  disappointing, I will try to explain why he disappointed me. Thus you can judge whether you, too, might suffer the same fate. First thing to say is that the young  John Keats  was not really that great a poet. (By "young", I mean up to and including  Endymion .) That, of course, is a judgment many readers will disagree with, but don't discount it! It was  Keats 's own judgment. In his preface to  Endymion , he says "I apologize for the lousy work, but I just had to get this out of my system." (Obviously I'm paraphrasing.) You may dismiss that as false modesty, but I am more inclined to accept it as the judgment of a man who knew what he was talking about, especially because the quality of his poetry abr...