Skip to main content

★★☆☆☆ Good on the facts, bad on interpretation

Chaos: Making a New Science

James Gleick

Chaos: Making a New Science was the first book by James Gleick I read. I read one other book of his subsequently, his biography of Richard FeynmanGenius. I hope never to read another book by Gleick, because, while informative, they are annoying and misleading.

What I liked about Chaos: I learned a lot about the history of chaos theory research by reading Chaos. For instance, I didn't realize that as great deal of chaos research was done at the University of California at Santa Cruz. I even learned a little about chaos theory, but not much, because it's a subject I have been interested in for many years.

What I didn't like: Gleick tells about chaos research as a Scientific Revolution, of the type Thomas S. Kuhn wrote about in his famous book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. It is my opinion that Kuhn was mostly wrong. But that is less important than the observation that chaos research clearly was not a scientific revolution of the type described by Kuhn. It was exciting mainstream mathematical research that was welcomed and encouraged by the math establishment. I was there and watching.

I was a 20-year-old brand-new grad student when Robert M. May published his famous 1976 Nature review paper, "Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics". This paper is now esteemed a classic of chaos research. It described the onset of chaos in what we now call the Logistic Map, one of the simplest chaotic systems. May left a lot unexplained, because at that time no one understood the Logistic Map or chaos very well. I thought it was a terrific paper. I gobbled it down with enthusiasm and for weeks after bored my fellow grad students (who, being Biochemistry students were less interested in math than I) by gassing about it.

In 1981 Douglas R. Hofstadter wrote an excellent column in Scientific American on the subject of "Strange attractors: mathematical patterns delicately poised between order and chaos", which once again tackled the logistic map, but with far more resolution, since chaos research had progressed a lot in the meantime. Hofstadter was able at this time to point out the connection to fractals and to mention Benoît B. Mandelbrot. "Strange attractors" was an installment of Hofstadter's monthly recreational mathematics column "Metamagical Themas".

By 1986 it had become clear that the logistic map is closely connected to a particular fractal, the Mandelbrot Set. Heinz-Otto Peitgen and Peter H. Richter produced a book, The Beauty of Fractals: Images of Complex Dynamical Systems, of beautiful pictures of the Mandelbrot set and other fractals, and Mandelbrot screensavers were seen on computers all over the world. Also in 1986 Scientific American published a regular research article on chaos theory simply entitled "Chaos" that extended it beyond the logistic map. Gleick published Chaos in 1987.

I mentioned these things to make a point. If your field of research is introduced by a review article in Nature (there was in 1976 no more prestigious venue for a scientific publication), is written up in the world's best-known popular mathematics column, is published in a full research paper in Scientific American, and is the source of screensavers and a coffee table book of pictures, you are not the Plucky Young Revolutionaries -- you're the Entrenched Establishment.

Now, Gleick did not entirely imagine the revolutionary narrative. In my experience, chaologists were (and are) apt to whine about old-time mathematicians who fail to recognize the significance of their (the chaologists') work. But, Mr Gleick, have you met humans? Feeling underappreciated is their thing! Well, it's ONE of their things. Of course, they didn't entirely imagine the resistance, some old-time mathematicians didn't fully appreciate chaos theory at the start, although my impression is that the resistance was mainly against the practice of doing math by computer, not chaos theory itself. Conservative reaction to novelty is another of those human things. And of course the chaologists would complain, because complaining is yet another of those human things.

Gleick is too credulous. I'm not suggesting that anyone meant to fool Gleick, but in looking for a Good Story he nevertheless fooled himself. He took the whining at face value and improved it with Kuhnian special sauce.

Amazon review

Goodreads review
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

★★★☆☆ The Great Geometer

The Impossible Man: Roger Penrose and the Cost of Genius Patchen Barss If I were asked to name the greatest physicists of the second half of the twentieth century, I would probably choose three:  Richard Feynman ,  Steven Weinberg , and  Roger Penrose . (I am a neuroscientist and a mathematician with a long interest in physics. I'm not the best person to choose great physicists, but I'm not the worst.) Thus when my local Theoretical Physics Institute (every town should have one!), the  Perimeter Institute , announced a public presentation by  Patchen Barss , a science journalist who has written this biography of  Penrose , I immediately snagged a ticket. Barss  wounded my confidence by emitting that cliché of the science popularizer: that you make science interesting by telling the "human story." Oh, please! I don't read a biography of  Penrose  for the sake of the human story. Why do science popularizers find it so hard to believe that there...

★★★★☆ What are these people?

Red Side Story Jasper Fforde When I reviewed   Shades of Grey , the first novel in  Jasper Fforde 's  Shades of Grey  series, I asked Although I referred to Eddie as a young man, it is not clear to me what the people of the Collective are. I think they are more-or-less human. ... However, in some ways they behave like automata. These are puzzles that I hope Jasper Fforde will clear up in subsequent novels in the Shades of Grey series. Now I'm patting myself on the back, because that is indeed what  Red Side Story  is about. Or so say I. You might think it is about other things -- a love story, a fight to survive, a battle for justice, a cycle race -- and you would not be wrong.  Red Side Story  contains multitudes. Shades of Grey  ended in a flurry of revelations about the Collective. Eddie, Jane and Courtland Gamboge visited the abandoned town of High Saffron, where Jane revealed that all the people supposedly sent to Reboot were in fact sen...

★★★★☆ The Duchess, the Prince, and the Preacher

The Apocalypse Codex Charles Stross Bob Howard, we have been told several times in the previous three  Laundry Files  novels, is being groomed for rapid advancement in the Laundry. In this episode he is given a "training wheels" assignment by Gerald Lockhart, a senior manager in the Department of External Assets, a division of the Laundry of which Bob understands little, and most of that wrong. He is asked to supervise two of the external assets Gerry's division manages: the sorceress Persephone Hazard (codename BASHFUL INCIENDARY) and her muscle Johnny McTavish (codename JOHNNY PRINCE) as they investigate Raymond Schiller, the pastor of an American megachurch called the Golden Promise Ministries, which has begun fishing for converts in the Prime Minister's cabinet, making him a person of interest to UK intelligence agencies. Bob is to tag along and supervise (in the lightest possible way, since they know what they're doing and he does not) the operation. Well, as...

★★★★☆ Enola is looking for a friend

The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan Nancy Springer I just finished three weighty novels. If you care, and there is no reason I know that you should, they were  City of Miracles ,  The Running Grave , and  Starling House , good novels all, but no light fare. Therefore, I told myself wisely, "Self! What you want now is something light and sweet and crunchy! You want an  Enola Holmes  novel!" Thus I gobbled down Book 4,  The Case of the Peculiar Pink Fan . It was just the thing!  Pink Fan  is the best  Enola Holmes  book so far, in my opinion. Enola is not OK. Despite her mother's frequently repeated mantra, "You will do very well on your own", Enola is not doing great on her own. Abandoned at the age of fourteen by her mother, hunted by her formidable brothers Sherlock and Mycroft, who want to take her freedom away, and without friends, Enola longs for affection. To be sure, plenty remains of the funds her mother embezzled from Mycroft and l...

★★★★★ A Cyberspace Cowboy

Count Zero William Gibson Count Zero  was the first book in  William Gibson 's  Cyberspace  trilogy I read. I picked it up in an airport bookstore, where it was on display, so it was probably pretty newly published -- let's say 1984. The Internet existed -- I had been using it to send email, although that was still pretty difficult and took some figgerin. It would be another ten years before  Tim Berners-Lee 's World-Wide Web got off the ground as a thing that any academic could use, and thus a version of  Gibson 's cyberspace became real. There were no eBooks back them (not really), which meant that a person like me, who must ALWAYS have a book to read, had to carry a backpack full of heavy paper books when I traveled. A quick glance in the bookstore made it clear that  Count Zero  was my kind of book. And it was. As it happens, the series works almost equally well in the order  Count Zero ,  Neuromancer ,  Mona Lisa Overdrive ...

★★★☆☆ Commentary disguised as a novel

The Handmaid's Tale Margaret Atwood I think I read  The Handmaid’s Tale  around 1986, when it first came out and became famous. I found it tedious. I have since looked at one or two other works by  Margaret Atwood , and honestly, I have never enjoyed one. You have probably spotted my problem. It is that verb "enjoy". I read books for enjoyment. Not only enjoyment, but also enlightenment and information, and to broaden my mind. But I also enjoy those things, so the verb "enjoy" should not be taken to imply that I will only read a book that is a ball of fun fluff. (Indeed, if you care to peruse the list of books I have recently reviewed, you'll see a five-star review for  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering . Let me just state, for the record, that  The Handmaid’s Tale  is less entertaining than  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos . To me! Of course I speak only for myself.) But  The Handmaid’s T...

★★★★★ Tactical Assault Clown

Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass—How I Went 77 Years Without Growing Up Dave Barry There is one living human who can write prose that makes me laugh so hard I can't breathe. That person is Tactical Assault Clown  Dave Barry .  Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass—How I Went 77 Years Without Growing Up  had that effect on me at least twice -- an automatic five-star rating. ("Tactical Assault Clown" is right up there with "Combat Epistemologist" ( The Jennifer Morgue ) on my list of creative military specializations. And if you're one of those people who get their knickers all in a twist when someone uses parens inside of parens, you know what you can do about it.) (Yes, I know I'm not funny.) It's not all ROFL funny. In fact, he tells about his father's alcoholism ( that story has a happy ending ) and his mother's suicide ( that one obviously does not ). Later in the book he tries to convince us that his real li...

★★★★☆ Ultimately, I found I didn't believe it

The Wire David Simon Yesterday I watched the last episode of Season 5 of  The Wire . Well, it was good. Obviously, it was good. It has won all kinds of awards, and everyone on Earth will tell you how great it is.  What I mean specifically is that it's good entertainment . The plots are intricate and engaging, and the characters are charismatic and well drawn. But I find myself reluctant to confer on it the mantle of greatness that almost everyone else does. Here's how I felt after watching the last episode. Many threads were brought to satisfying ends. We end up with a lot of vivid characters: the corrupt politician, the pushers, the international drug traffickers, the dope fiend, and murder police, murder police, murder police. And you know what? I didn't believe in any of them. They were all obviously fictional constructs. Well, I hear you saying, what did you expect? They are fiction. You knew that going in. But the best fiction transcends itself. You don't strain t...

★★★★☆ Making heroes of Rednecks and Hillbillies

Demon Copperhead Barbara Kingsolver You already know that  Demon Copperhead  by  Barbara Kingsolver  is a retelling of  David Copperfield  by  Charles Dickens . Indeed, it is so faithful a retelling that, if the publisher had not already spilled the beans, I would feel compelled to mark this review a spoiler because of mentioning  David Copperfield . If you have read  David Copperfield  at all recently, then you will recognize the characters and the major plot points as you read  Demon Copperhead . (I last read  David Copperfield  when I was a kid in the late 1960s, so I was blessedly free from this detailed anticipation as I read  Demon Copperhead . I did, however, check out the Wikipedia plot summary of  David Copperfield  on finishing  Demon Copperhead , so I'm up to speed on both plot outlines.) And this, I say, is absolutely fine! If you're going to steal, by all means, steal from the best! I am co...

★★★☆☆ Lacking the common touch

100 Selected Poems: John Keats John Keats Well, that was disappointing. I am ready to admit that this is an "It's not you -- it's me," case. Since I suspect that some other readers, even readers who love poetry, may likewise find  Keats  disappointing, I will try to explain why he disappointed me. Thus you can judge whether you, too, might suffer the same fate. First thing to say is that the young  John Keats  was not really that great a poet. (By "young", I mean up to and including  Endymion .) That, of course, is a judgment many readers will disagree with, but don't discount it! It was  Keats 's own judgment. In his preface to  Endymion , he says "I apologize for the lousy work, but I just had to get this out of my system." (Obviously I'm paraphrasing.) You may dismiss that as false modesty, but I am more inclined to accept it as the judgment of a man who knew what he was talking about, especially because the quality of his poetry abr...