Skip to main content

★★★★☆ Violence has declined, and no one really knows why

The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined

Steven Pinker

The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, by Steven Pinker, is about a fact that many people find startling: violence has declined steadily over the course of history, and we now live in the least violent time in human history. Wait, WHAT!?! Is that actually a FACT? Yes, it is, and the most compelling and valuable accomplishment of Better Angels is to document it. Pinker also spends a lot of ink in trying to explain the decline of violence, and in this he is less successful.

There are two aspects of the way Pinker thinks that will put off many readers. (Well, there are more than two, but these two are somewhat intentional.) First, Pinker's argument is quantitative. If you don't like or understand numbers, his arguments will whizz right past you. For instance, he laments "the innumeracy of our journalistic and intellectual culture," giving this example

The journalist Michael Kinsley recently wrote, “It is a crushing disappointment that Boomers entered adulthood with Americans killing and dying halfway around the world, and now, as Boomers reach retirement and beyond, our country is doing the same damned thing.” This assumes that 5,000 Americans dying is the same damned thing as 58,000 Americans dying, and that a hundred thousand Iraqis being killed is the same damned thing as several million Vietnamese being killed.

If you can't distinguish 5,000 from 58,000, you're not going to get much out of Better Angels. Second, in the interest of trying to explain why violence has described, Pinker often finds himself obliged to try to understand why violence happens. To an undiscerning reader, such explanations may look like justifications. I don't think they are intended to be that or are that, but I am quite certain that some readers will be offended.

Better Angels has ten chapters. The first, "A Foreign Country", is a relatively brief survey of some sources and facts we are all familiar with, whose aim is to convince you that it is in fact plausible that the past was much more violent than the present. Chapters 2-7 then carefully document in quantitative detail six ways in which we have become less violent, from decreases in war and murder through decreased abuse of children, women, and animals. Chapters 8 and 9 are Pinker the professional psychologist attempting to explain the psychology of the processes that he believes underlie the reduction in violence. The final chapter, chapter 10, is a kind of executive summary of the entire book.

Chapters 2-7 are the heart of the book. I found them quite convincing overall. You aren't going to believe everything that Pinker tells you. And experts have sniped around the edges some of his figures. But the reduction in violence he documents is so huge, something like a 150-fold decrease in violent death over the course of history, that none of the revisions some experts would like to make to his figures amounts to more than a minor correction.

Better Angels has one major fault -- it is far too long. It is hugely bulked out by Pinker's attempts to identify causes for the trends he documents, and to document the scientific evidence, where it exists, for these causes. He clearly worked very hard on explanations, and it pains me to say that they are not very convincing. You will believe them if you already believed them before reading.

I would advise a first-time reader to begin with chapter 10. Then read chapters 1-7. In chapters 2-7 I would advise skimming or skipping the attempted explanations -- pay most attention to the parts that document the trends in violence. (These are usually obvious by the presence of large numbers of down-sloping graphs.) Read chapters 8 and 9 only if you are a glutton for tedium.

This review sounds more negative than I wanted it to. Better Angels is actually a very good book. At least it contains one.

Amazon review

Goodreads review
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

★★☆☆☆ Death and What Comes Next is the thing it mocks

Death and What Comes Next Terry Pratchett Death and What Comes Next  is a short story (which you can read for free  here ) in  Terry Pratchett 's  Discworld . It is a conversation between Death (a character well known to  Discworld  readers) and a recently deceased philosopher. The philosopher spews a lot of vapid sophistry in which he argues that he might NOT be dead -- the word quantum is involved. Death responds with equal vapidity. Death has the last word, because... Duh... Usually, even in the worst  Discworld  production, you can rely on some  Pratchett  verbal fireworks to make it amusing. I am sorry to say that is not the case in  Death and What Comes Next . It's a dead loss on all counts, except that it is only one page long, so it is but a small waste of time. Death and What Comes Next  on The L-Space Goodreads review  

★★★★☆ Hanging out with Death

Reaper Man Terry Pratchett Death (the character, not the phenomenon) is the only real hero of  Terry Pratchett 's  Discworld . Unlike every other  Discworld  character (with Granny Weatherwax and Lord Vetinari as sporadic but unreliable exceptions) Death is relentlessly competent and by his lights ethical. He's also a kind of cool guy to hang out with. Already he has developed a personality. Although  Reaper Man  is only the second book in the  Death subseries , we readers have seen quite a lot of him. In a series in which violence plays as important a role as  Discworld , and in which in addition there is a specific character who shows up every time someone dies, you can safely bet that Death is going to have at least a cameo in each Discworld novel. Not everyone loves Death. There is a body of people -- well, not people, best just call them entities -- called the Auditors of Reality who take it on themselves to make sure the universe runs as it ...

★★★★★ Enjoyable guide to vegan nutrition

Laurel's Kitchen Laurel Robertson, Carol Lee Flinders, Bronwen Godfrey I do not cook, I don't want to cook, I don't plan to cook. (Very happy to buy my whole wheat bread from the bakery at my big box grocery store thank-you-very-much.) I have never tried a recipe from  Laurel's Kitchen , and I never will. So why, you ask, am I reviewing a cookbook? Because I read it with pleasure, and I am here to tell you that it is worth reading, even if you don't cook. I was a grad student in Biochemistry at Stanford when I read  Laurel's Kitchen , probably around 1980, not many years after it was published. Many of my friends were dance and drama students. This was very much the astrology and granola crowd. (I was the token hard scientist of the bunch.) They alerted me to the existence of  Laurel's Kitchen . Laurel's Kitchen  was a surprisingly good read. It was as entertaining as a novel, indeed, more entertaining than many novels I have read (looking at you,  Fifty...

★★★★★ Finding a home

The Blue Sword Robin McKinley When I was growing up my father's job kept my family moving. Mom and Dad eventually settled down, but just when they did I became an itinerant academic, moving to study and work at various research institutions. I was a 27 year old grad student at Stanford when I first read  The Blue Sword  and the longest I had ever lived in one place was six years. (Understand, I am not complaining -- I was and am a Happy Nomad.) There's a peculiar type of homesickness experienced by rootless people. One usually thinks of homesickness as being away from and missing a very specific place -- the place one calls home. But I had no place to call home. And yet I sometimes felt homesick -- I felt the lack of a home -- all the more because there was no home where I longed to be. In the first few chapters of  The Blue Sword  I immediately recognized this feeling of rootless homesickness in Angharad (Harry) Crewe, the hero of the book. As the book begins Harry ...

★★☆☆☆ Misery, Canadian style

The New Oxford Book of Canadian Short Stories Margaret Atwood (Editor), Robert Weaver (Editor) I read  The New Oxford Book of Canadian Short Stories , (eds  Margaret Atwood ,  Robert Weaver ) because it is the textbook for a community college course I've registered for this winter called "Writing Short Stories". This is one of the worst short story collections I have ever read in my life. I noticed early on that it appeared to be the same story over and over again. A man and a woman are trapped in a desperately unhappy marriage. Maybe something happens, or maybe not. It is evident that for  Atwood  and  Weaver  plot is entirely optional. Some of the stories had one, and some did not. There were rare exceptions to the desperately unhappy marriage storyline, in which the characters were miserable for other reasons. You know that feeling of relief as you approach the end of a really bad book? I had that feeling 45 times in rapid succession as I worked my ...

★★★★☆ Horror fiction writers: this is how you do it

Crypt of the Moon Spider Nathan Ballingrud I am not a big fan of horror fiction. I think, however, that is because, as a general rule, it is so poorly done. I'm being unfair -- when I say "it is poorly done", what I mean is that it doesn't horrify me. I am not horrified by creepy-crawlies -- in fact, I spent more than 30 years of my life studying worms, so I think worms and bugs are kind of cool, very beautiful little machines, in fact. Blood and guts and gore also don't bother me. What I find really scary is psychological terror -- the fear of losing oneself. Nameless fears -- the "nameless" part is important. As a filmmaker once remarked, if you want to really be scary, never show the audience the monster. Leave it to their imaginations -- the monster they imagine is always scarier than anything you can put on the screen. As soon as you show the monster, as soon as you name the fear, it becomes a concrete problem to be solved, and that will never be as...

★★★★★ The best kind of childishness!

What If? 2 Randall Munroe Randall Munroe  is the author of the free web comic  XKCD . XKCD comics are instantly recognizable by  Munroe 's surprisingly individual and expressive faceless stick-figure characters. They are less instantly recognizable by their focus on science and mathematics, and by  Munroe 's ability to write startlingly accurate jokes on these subjects which are actually funny, but also sometimes informative or touching, For a few years now he has also had  a blog called "What If?"  in which he answers questions from users.  What If? Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions  and  What If? 2  are collections of those questions and answers. I started with  What If? 2  because I mistakenly ordered it before  What If? 1 . I do, however, follow  Munroe 's What If? blog, so it is likely I've seen most of  What If? 1 . Just to give you a taste, the first question of  What If? 2 ...

★★★★☆ Go, Team Weird!

Premeditated Myrtle Elizabeth C. Bunce Probably when you were a kid there were times when you felt you were not like other kids. (I may be wrong, but I'm guessing this is a universal human experience.) Myrtle Hardcastle (the hero of  Elizabeth C. Bunce 's  Myrtle Hardcastle  series is a precocious 12-year-old girl, the daughter of Prosecutor Arthur Hardcastle. His position is something like that of a District Attorney in the modern US legal system -- a government lawyer whose job is to prosecute criminals in court. As  Elizabeth C. Bunce  explains in an Author's Note, such Prosecutors were a relatively new thing in England in 1893. Myrtle is motherless -- her mother, who studied to be a physician, died of cancer some years ago. Myrtle's ambition is to be a detective or prosecutor or something like that. (She probably knows precisely what she wants -- that would be like Myrtle, but she was not entirely explicit about her plans, hence my vagueness.) To this end sh...

★★★☆☆ Confusingly eclectic

The Mongoliad Neal Stephenson, Greg Bear, Mark Teppo, E.D. deBirmingham, Erik Bear, Joseph Brassey, Cooper Moo I read this book ten years ago (27-Aug-2012). I don't remember much detail -- just some confused mental images of battles in Asian deserts and forests. I picked it up because of  Neal Stephenson . However, it is a multi-author work, and didn't really feel like a typical  Stephenson  novel to me.  Stephenson  is not to everyone's taste, so that could be a good thing. This was a more conventional adventure and war story. There are many pieces. I generally felt that each piece worked well on its own. They didn't always fit together in a way that made obvious sense to me. Bottom line -- I enjoyed it, but it's never going to be a favorite. I didn't go on to read any of the other books in  The Foreworld Saga , which tells me that I wasn't impressed. Amazon review Goodreads review  

★★☆☆☆ There must be a more concise way to say, "Scientists are bad, and I don't understand virology."

  Rise: A Newsflesh Collection Mira Grant Rise: A Newsflesh Collection  is a collection of short fiction adjacent to  Seanan McGuire 's  Newsflesh series  of zombie novels. It includes all the Newflesh short fiction currently (14-Jul-2022) listed on  Goodreads' Newsflesh series page , except for  Fed . And the collection is NOT short. Most of the eight stories included are novellas and took me about two hours each. So, it was a long slog, which I undertook only as part of my project to read everything  McGuire  has published. I was glad to reach the end. There is, in my opinion, one rather good story in here:  The Day the Dead Came to Show and Tell . By itself it would rate a high three stars. It is the reason the book gets two stars rather than one. Without further ado, here are the stories: Countdown  tells the story of how the Kellis-Amberlee virus (the Newsflesh zombie virus) came to be. it is a long recitation of  McGuire ...