Skip to main content

★★★★★ Classic anti-military novel

The Forever War

Joe Haldeman

If you know anything about The Forever War, you probably know that it is a classic Anti-War science fiction novel. And if you read science fiction more than casually, you probably *have* heard of The Forever War. It won the trifecta: Hugo, Nebula, and Locus awards for best novel. And it deserves the awards.

I read it because of the awards, not long after it came out in 1974. Now of course it was not the first antiwar book I had read. War is easy to be against, and the list of authors who have written novels that condemn war is very, very long. What took me by surprise, however, was that The Forever War is not just an antiwar book -- it is a book that condemns and mocks the armed forces. As a teenager this was new to me.

It is now, fifty years later, almost taboo to do what Joe Haldeman does here. For many Americans the only acceptable attitude towards the men and women of the military is abject unquestioning worship. One is not allowed to suggest that the military is a huge government burocracy, and like any organization so large, it probably includes many stupid people. (Also many smart people and a few geniuses.) In a nation where politicians demonstrate fiscal virtue by taking food out of the mouths of children (literally), it is still politically almost impossible to give the military any less money than it asks for.

Now, if you signal to a large burocracy that its budget is untouchable, you can bet there will be waste and corruption. And of course there is. There was waste and corruption in the Athenian navy, and in the World War II US Air Force (see David Fairbank White's Wings of War) and in the forces that fought in Vietnam (see Neil Sheehan's A Bright Shining Lie).

It is the last that is most relevant to The Forever WarHaldeman served in Vietnam, and saw the stupidity and corruption close-up.

The Forever War was a difficult novel to publish. In his Author's note, Haldeman tells us that it was rejected by 18 publishers. Even in our post-Vietnam funk, when Americans were disgusted with themselves and their armed forces, a novel that so nakedly condemned and ridiculed the military was not an easy sell. Ben Bova serialized it in Analog and eventually successfully shopped it to St Martin's Press, which had never before published adult science fiction. The hardback published by St Martin's and the paperback eventually derived from it were the slightly butchered version that had appeared in serial form in Analog. That's the version I read fifty years ago.

Haldeman describes this new book as "the definitive version of The Forever War". It includes the novella You Can Never Go Back, which Bova rejected. It also includes a new Foreword by John Scalzi, which is just as good as you would expect a Foreword from Scalzi to be.

Amazon review

Goodreads review
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

★★★★☆ The First Law of Quantum Communication

Quanta and Fields: The Biggest Ideas in the Universe Sean Carroll The First Law of Quantum Communication is that all explanations of Quantum Mechanics for general audiences are really, really bad*.  Sean Carroll 's  Quanta and Fields: The Biggest Ideas in the Universe  is very different from every previous pop quantum mechanics explanation I have ever read. The question before us is whether it is an exception to the First Law, or a uniquely creative new example. Where I'm coming from: I am a retired neuroscientist and mathematician. I am familiar with and comfortable with quantum mechanics. I have also, to my sorrow, read dozens of pop physics explanations of quantum mechanics, because every pop physics book begins with the same tiresome six chapters intended to bring the presumed ignorant reader up to speed on relativity and quantum mechanics. And they are almost uniformly TERRIBLE. They are terrible for multiple reasons, but most of these come down to a determination on the p

★★★☆☆ I skimmed the "sexy bits"

A Power Unbound Freya Marske I picked up  Freya Marske 's  Last Binding  trilogy because it was nominated for a Best Series Hugo in 2024. It would not get my vote. I am not a big fan of romance, and am even less a fan of erotica.  A Marvellous Light  contains this acknowledgement And a special shout-out to my mother, who was the first person to tell me that she couldn’t put this book down, and who forgave me for making her read the sexy bits. There are indeed sexy bits in all three novels, and they are explicit and LONG. That was even more true in this, the final novel, because the erotica plays a part in the plot. One of the romantic partners, Alan Ross, is a writer of erotica (although he scorns such euphemism -- he just calls it "pornography"), and the other, Jack Alston, Lord Hawthorn, is one of his readers. I have nothing against erotica in principle, but it is just not what I'm looking for in my reading. I feel about it much the way I imagine  Marske 's moth

★★★☆☆ Not this

Selected Poems (Dover Thrift Editions) by Emily Dickinson Emily Dickinson For me the essential experience of poetry is the “Yes, THAT!” moment, when you read a verse, and you know EXACTLY what it means. A moment was captured, a feeling, a thought. Now, I do not claim that this is the only way to experience poetry, or the right way, or the best way. It is only my way. This works if the mind of the poet and the mind of the reader meet. That makes the experience of poetry very personal. And, I am sorry to say,  Emily Dickinson ’s mind and mine didn’t often meet. It was not a complete loss. For instance, this landed The bustle in a house The morning after death Is solemnest of industries Enacted upon Earth,— The sweeping up the heart, And putting love away We shall not want to use again Until eternity. But it was one of perhaps three poems in this collection that did. Even the famous “Because I could not stop for Death” didn’t do much for me. Part of the problem for me was that  Dickinson

★★★☆☆ Moon gods, metaphysics, and sneers

Tidal Creatures Seanan McGuire Tidal Creatures  is the third novel in  Seanan McGuire 's  Alchemical Journeys  series, or the seventh if you include the  Up and Under  books. The unifying principle behind the series is the personification of things that are not persons, objectively or scientifically speaking, such as the Doctrine of Ethos ( Middlegame ), Winter and Summer ( Seasonal Fears ), and now the Moon. Five of the main characters are Moon goddesses (Aske, Change'e, Artemis, Diana) and a Moon god (Máni). We also meet Kelpie, who is not in fact a Kelpie, but a personification of Artemis's Hind. Each of the gods/goddesses is in fact two persons -- a god/dess and an ordinary human whose body the two share.  McGuire  explains the relationship at length. Roger Zelazny  began his career by writing about thirty stories, which he sent to all the Science Fiction magazines, for which purpose he had made a comprehensive list. In this way he collected 150 rejections and no accept

★★★★★ A little more conventional than Inkheart

Inkspell Cornelia Funke, Brendan Fraser (narrator) I joined audible.com and began listening to audiobooks in 2004. Among the first were  Cornelia Funke 's  Inkworld  trilogy. They were very good -- good books, but also very well read. And since the series is about the magic of reading aloud, this is appropriate. Recently, however, I learned that  Inkworld  is no longer a trilogy. A fourth novel,  Die Farbe der Rache  ( The Color/Ink/Dye of Revenge  -- the German title is a pun that doesn't translate) has recently been published. Wanting to read it, I decided I would first go back and re-listen to the first three books. Inkspell  is, in my opinion, both better than  Inkheart  and not quite as good. It is better in that the  Inkspell  narrator,  Brendan Fraser , is in my opinion more versatile than  Inkheart  narrator  Lynn Redgrave . Don't get me wrong:  Redgrave  is very good -- I would have no criticism of her, had I not heard  Fraser 's narration. On listening to  Ink

★★★☆☆ Good on the facts, relentlessly infuriating interpretation

Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman James Gleick I read  James Gleick 's  Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman  not long after it came out in 1993. I read it because of my interest in  Feynman , but I went into it with some trepidation, because I had read  Gleick 's  Chaos: Making a New Science , and I did NOT like it. Here is what I think of  Gleick : he's a writer who thinks he's smarter than his readers. He is not content to give you just the facts and allow you to draw your own conclusions -- he wants to have INSIGHTS, which he insists on pressing on you in such a way as to cause you to marvel at his,  Gleick 's, brilliance. But I will say this for him -- he's a thorough researcher. If you want the facts about something and can ignore  Gleick 's insights, you may benefit from reading him. I learned things about  Feynman  that I didn't know before reading  Genius . Gleick 's deep insight about  Feynman  is that he worked to

★★★★★ Twenty-five years of recreational mathematics

Hexaflexagons and Other Mathematical Diversions Martin Gardner In 1967 my Aunt Althea, the very best of all possible aunts, gave me a subscription to  Scientific American  for my twelfth birthday. I remined a subscriber until the 1990s. Among the best features of  SA  were the monthly columns "The Amateur Scientist", where you could learn how to build a laser in your garage -- you think I'm joking, but I'm serious -- and  Martin Gardner 's Recreational Mathematics column "Mathematical Games". Yes, I know that to many of you the phrase "recreational mathematics" makes about as much sense as "recreational colonoscopy", but there are enough people who were willing to entertain the idea that math could be fun to sustain  Gardner 's column for 26 years. I was one, and  Gardner  was brilliant. These columns were collected and published in fifteen books by  SA . The best way to get them now is in electronic form. There is a searchable CD

★★★☆☆ A LOT of novel

Myriad Joshua David Bellin Once when I was a postdoc at MIT, I heard physicist  Alan Guth  speak in the Physics Colloquium.  Guth  was known for having invented the idea of  Cosmic Inflation , that the universe exploded in size just BEFORE the Big Bang, setting the initial conditions for the Big Bang. (Versions of this idea are now mainstream physics.) In his Colloquium, he discussed the possibility that inflation could start anytime, anywhere, from quantum fluctuations. This, he showed us, would lead to the creation of a new universe. He then asked how we might see this. And he showed us that since the new universe would be entirely unattached to the one in which it began, there would be no observable consequence in the universe in which it originated. I was bemused. It felt to me as if he had walked down to the front of the room, pulled his hand out of his pocket and there unfolded an entire new universe. He then folded the new universe back up in his hand and put it back in his pock

★★★★★ Faery Cosmology

Be the Serpent Seanan McGuire Regarding spoilers: I wrote most of this review before reading  Be the Serpent , based on what I thought was coming. (Thus, it is not, strictly speaking, a review, but a preview, or perhaps a precognition 😀) I then read the book, and it turned out I needed to fix almost nothing. So, there are no spoilers here: nothing that could not be foreseen, except for one small one, which will be evident. Be the Serpent  is one of the best October Daye novels to date. The best was  The Winter Long . In  The Winter Long   Seanan McGuire  did what I have come to see as the characteristic  McGuire  move: she rewrote the past. You may have thought you knew what was going on when you read  Rosemary and Rue , but you did not.  The Winter Long  shows you that what actually happened in  Rosemary and Rue  was entirely different from the story Toby told in that book.  The Winter Long  completely reshaped the world we thought we were in.  The Winter Long  wasn't the only bo

★★★☆☆ An examination of mystery fiction

Everyone In My Family Has Killed Someone Benjamin Stevenson My title for this review makes it sound like  Benjamin Stevenson 's  Everyone in My Family Has Killed Someone  is an academic work on mystery fiction. It is not. It is, in fact, a murder mystery. The title choice was deliberate, though, because at times it feels very academic. Our hero, Ernest Cunningham, is an author who writes HOWTO books for would-be mystery writers. That is, he writes short little self-published eBooks that go for $1.99. The book in fact ends with an advertisement for two of these books:  10 Easy Steps to Write Crime Like You Lived in the 1930s  and  Golden Age to Your Golden Page: How to Write a Mystery . They don't exist, of course. Murder mysteries are like sonnets or haiku -- a defined literary form with specific and somewhat arbitrary rules that writers are supposed to follow. Ernest Cunningham of course, knows all these rules, and he is very explicit about what they are and how he is being ca