★★★☆☆ Ontological comedy

Redshirts

John Scalzi

Let me start by asking you a question. Is Spock (science officer of the Enterprise, played by Leonard Nimoy in the original Star Trek) real? Here's the answer given by a Cornell philosophy professor (probably Max Black)

Whenever anyone asked him whether something was real, he always gave the same answer. The answer was "Yes." The tooth fairy is real, the laws of physics are real, the rules of baseball are real, and the rocks in the fields are real. But they are real in different ways.
-- Max Black (?), quoted in Sokal's Hoax, by Steven Weinberg

So, yes. If you buy Black's ontology, Spock is real. Hermione Granger is real, ghosts are real, money is real, the Presidency of the USA is real, SO(3), the group of three-dimensional rotations -- all of them are real. They are real, even though they exist only in people's minds.

Now, I admit that if someone asks me with no context, "Are ghosts real?", I will answer "No." For everyday discourse, it is useful to distinguish between the different ways of being real that Black referred to, and not count some. As Weinberg writes

What I mean when I say that the laws of physics are real is that they are real in pretty much the same sense (whatever that is) as the rocks in the fields, and not in the same sense ... as the rules of baseball -- we did not create the laws of physics or the rocks in the field, and we sometimes unhappily find that we have been wrong about them, as when we stub our toe on an unnoticed rock, or when we find we have made a mistake (as most physicists have) about some physical law.

That was not a digression -- the reality of imaginary things is what Redshirts is all about. Now, let me reassure you: John Scalzi is a much better writer than me, and his foray into the ontology of imaginary things is far more amusing than mine. Nevertheless, the questions I raised are there and are central to Redshirts.

The main characters of Redshirts are low-ranking grunts on the spaceship Intrepid. Intrepid has ridiculously frequent senseless violent deaths among the low-ranking grunts. If you're familiar with the Star Trek Redshirts trope, you've already guessed at the reason. The crew of the Intrepid are characters in a TV show, and things that happen on Intrepid happen to satisfy the writers' dramatic needs.

Are they real? Well, we've already beaten that to death. If they're real, do the writers who created them owe them anything?

It's all very clever and I enjoyed it, but as Scalzi himself has written, "The failure mode of clever is 'asshole'.". Redshirts is not an asshole-level failure -- in fact, it's engaging and fun, if a touch narcissistic. It is, IMHO, decidedly TOO clever. It's an inside baseball story -- it's a story of a writer writing about writing. Also, a warning -- it will make more sense if you are familiar with at least one Star Trek TV series.

So, clever and fun, but not Scalzi's best.

Amazon review

Goodreads review

Comments

★★★★☆ The First Law of Quantum Communication

Quanta and Fields: The Biggest Ideas in the Universe Sean Carroll The First Law of Quantum Communication is that all explanations of Quantum Mechanics for general audiences are really, really bad*. Sean Carroll 's Quanta and Fields: The Biggest Ideas in the Universe is very different from every previous pop quantum mechanics explanation I have ever read. The question before us is whether it is an exception to the First Law, or a uniquely creative new example. Where I'm coming from: I am a retired neuroscientist and mathematician. I am familiar with and comfortable with quantum mechanics. I have also, to my sorrow, read dozens of pop physics explanations of quantum mechanics, because every pop physics book begins with the same tiresome six chapters intended to bring the presumed ignorant reader up to speed on relativity and quantum mechanics. And they are almost uniformly TERRIBLE. They are terrible for multiple reasons, but most of these come down to a determination on the p

★★★☆☆ I skimmed the "sexy bits"

A Power Unbound Freya Marske I picked up Freya Marske 's Last Binding trilogy because it was nominated for a Best Series Hugo in 2024. It would not get my vote. I am not a big fan of romance, and am even less a fan of erotica. A Marvellous Light contains this acknowledgement And a special shout-out to my mother, who was the first person to tell me that she couldn’t put this book down, and who forgave me for making her read the sexy bits. There are indeed sexy bits in all three novels, and they are explicit and LONG. That was even more true in this, the final novel, because the erotica plays a part in the plot. One of the romantic partners, Alan Ross, is a writer of erotica (although he scorns such euphemism -- he just calls it "pornography"), and the other, Jack Alston, Lord Hawthorn, is one of his readers. I have nothing against erotica in principle, but it is just not what I'm looking for in my reading. I feel about it much the way I imagine Marske 's moth

★★★☆☆ Not this

Selected Poems (Dover Thrift Editions) by Emily Dickinson Emily Dickinson For me the essential experience of poetry is the “Yes, THAT!” moment, when you read a verse, and you know EXACTLY what it means. A moment was captured, a feeling, a thought. Now, I do not claim that this is the only way to experience poetry, or the right way, or the best way. It is only my way. This works if the mind of the poet and the mind of the reader meet. That makes the experience of poetry very personal. And, I am sorry to say, Emily Dickinson ’s mind and mine didn’t often meet. It was not a complete loss. For instance, this landed The bustle in a house The morning after death Is solemnest of industries Enacted upon Earth,— The sweeping up the heart, And putting love away We shall not want to use again Until eternity. But it was one of perhaps three poems in this collection that did. Even the famous “Because I could not stop for Death” didn’t do much for me. Part of the problem for me was that Dickinson

★★★☆☆ Moon gods, metaphysics, and sneers

Tidal Creatures Seanan McGuire Tidal Creatures is the third novel in Seanan McGuire 's Alchemical Journeys series, or the seventh if you include the Up and Under books. The unifying principle behind the series is the personification of things that are not persons, objectively or scientifically speaking, such as the Doctrine of Ethos ( Middlegame ), Winter and Summer ( Seasonal Fears ), and now the Moon. Five of the main characters are Moon goddesses (Aske, Change'e, Artemis, Diana) and a Moon god (Máni). We also meet Kelpie, who is not in fact a Kelpie, but a personification of Artemis's Hind. Each of the gods/goddesses is in fact two persons -- a god/dess and an ordinary human whose body the two share. McGuire explains the relationship at length. Roger Zelazny began his career by writing about thirty stories, which he sent to all the Science Fiction magazines, for which purpose he had made a comprehensive list. In this way he collected 150 rejections and no accept

★★★★★ Twenty-five years of recreational mathematics

Hexaflexagons and Other Mathematical Diversions Martin Gardner In 1967 my Aunt Althea, the very best of all possible aunts, gave me a subscription to Scientific American for my twelfth birthday. I remined a subscriber until the 1990s. Among the best features of SA were the monthly columns "The Amateur Scientist", where you could learn how to build a laser in your garage -- you think I'm joking, but I'm serious -- and Martin Gardner 's Recreational Mathematics column "Mathematical Games". Yes, I know that to many of you the phrase "recreational mathematics" makes about as much sense as "recreational colonoscopy", but there are enough people who were willing to entertain the idea that math could be fun to sustain Gardner 's column for 26 years. I was one, and Gardner was brilliant. These columns were collected and published in fifteen books by SA . The best way to get them now is in electronic form. There is a searchable CD

★★★☆☆ A LOT of novel

Myriad Joshua David Bellin Once when I was a postdoc at MIT, I heard physicist Alan Guth speak in the Physics Colloquium. Guth was known for having invented the idea of Cosmic Inflation , that the universe exploded in size just BEFORE the Big Bang, setting the initial conditions for the Big Bang. (Versions of this idea are now mainstream physics.) In his Colloquium, he discussed the possibility that inflation could start anytime, anywhere, from quantum fluctuations. This, he showed us, would lead to the creation of a new universe. He then asked how we might see this. And he showed us that since the new universe would be entirely unattached to the one in which it began, there would be no observable consequence in the universe in which it originated. I was bemused. It felt to me as if he had walked down to the front of the room, pulled his hand out of his pocket and there unfolded an entire new universe. He then folded the new universe back up in his hand and put it back in his pock

★★★☆☆ An examination of mystery fiction

Everyone In My Family Has Killed Someone Benjamin Stevenson My title for this review makes it sound like Benjamin Stevenson 's Everyone in My Family Has Killed Someone is an academic work on mystery fiction. It is not. It is, in fact, a murder mystery. The title choice was deliberate, though, because at times it feels very academic. Our hero, Ernest Cunningham, is an author who writes HOWTO books for would-be mystery writers. That is, he writes short little self-published eBooks that go for $1.99. The book in fact ends with an advertisement for two of these books: 10 Easy Steps to Write Crime Like You Lived in the 1930s and Golden Age to Your Golden Page: How to Write a Mystery . They don't exist, of course. Murder mysteries are like sonnets or haiku -- a defined literary form with specific and somewhat arbitrary rules that writers are supposed to follow. Ernest Cunningham of course, knows all these rules, and he is very explicit about what they are and how he is being ca

★★★★☆ Portrait of a REALLY good politician

The Goblin Emperor Katherine Addison ** spoiler alert ** I'm marking this review as a spoiler because the central fact of The Goblin Emperor is that Maia is a really, really good politician. It is impossible to say that convincingly without also saying that he has political success. Of course, it could always happen that something goes horribly wrong in the end. But I would still have to admit that at some point in the book he is politically successful, which would be a spoiler. So, I'm taking the easy way out -- just mark the entire review a spoiler, and then I don't have to waddle awkwardly around the fact that Maia survives a coup attempt and an assassination attempt and ends the book as a successful and mostly well-liked leader. Now, I want to be clear, when I say "Maia is a really good politician", I understand that as a good thing. Politics is the name we give to the social mechanisms for making difficult decisions without violence. That is an extraordina

★★★★☆ Corruption and Witchcraft

A Hunger of Thorns Lili Wilkinson Don't you really want to hear more about evil and dark magic from the evil witches who choose it as a career? After all, Satan (AKA Lucifer) is the most compelling character in Paradise Lost , and Darth Vader is a pretty cool dude, when you think about it. Surely the Wicked Witch of the West has something to say for herself ? So, yeah, Wicked Witch point of view has been done. But not with this kind of conviction. Maude Jenkins, the main character of A Hunger of Thorns is a witch, as are her two grandmothers and as was her late mother. Are they wicked? Well, some people think they are. They don't see themselves as evil, but then the evilest people never do. These witches are no innocent nature-loving Wiccans. If you're addicted to the same pop culture trash as I am, think Elizaveta Arkadyevna , or Dark Willow . Maude and Mam and Nan are dark, powerful, and dangerous witches. They sometimes hurt people, although only rarely intentional

★★★☆☆ If you cross historical fiction with biography

The Old Lion: A Novel of Theodore Roosevelt Jeff Shaara A book recounting the life of Theodore Roosevelt could be one of (at least) two things: a biography (including in that category autobiography -- these exist ) or a novel. The subtitle of The Old Lion: A Novel of Theodore Roosevelt makes it clear which of these author Jeff Shaara was aiming for. And his "To the reader" note explains that choice The best way to describe this book is perhaps to describe what it is not. This is not a biography (and there are many), nor is it an academic examination of the man or his political policies (and there are many of those). Consider that the definitive biography of the man, by Edmund Morris, covers three volumes and totals more than 2,400 pages. Morris’s admirable work is essential to anyone seeking the most minute details of Roosevelt’s life. I did not have the means to expand this story into three volumes, nor would I wish to. What I have tried to do is create a story, with

Search This Blog